- Opponents of wind turbine project file a Ministerial Appeal wp.me/p1xGXa-ky via @wordpressdotcom 23 hours ago
Weekly NewsletterTo receive a newsletter contact email@example.com
Help Create A Legal Fund
Pledges and Donations Welcome!!!Manvers Wind Concerns is now collecting donations for the Legal Fund. These funds will be used for the ERT (Environmental Review Tribunal). For easy TD Canada Trust donation instructions please see Donation Instruction page in the menu bar above left. Please contact firstname.lastname@example.org to contribute. Thank-you very much for your commitment to preserving our neighbourhood.
- March 2015
- February 2015
- January 2015
- December 2014
- November 2014
- October 2014
- September 2014
- August 2014
- July 2014
- June 2014
- May 2014
- April 2014
- March 2014
- February 2014
- January 2014
- December 2013
- November 2013
- October 2013
- September 2013
- August 2013
- July 2013
- June 2013
- May 2013
- April 2013
- March 2013
- February 2013
- January 2013
- December 2012
- November 2012
- October 2012
- June 2012
- March 2012
- February 2012
- January 2012
- November 2011
- October 2011
- September 2011
- August 2011
- July 2011
- June 2011
- May 2011
WPD has launched an action against the City of Kawartha Lakes to quash the final roadblocks in their way to constructing Industrial Wind Turbines in your community just south of Bethany and north of Pontypool. They are trying to force COKL to open Wild Turkey road which they are NOT obligated by any statute to do. They are also attempting to quash or reduce development fees, and knock out the fire suppressant bylaw. Continue reading
The decision from the Provincial Tribunal on the Sumac Ridge Wind Factory ERT has been issued. Despite our best efforts and huge community support, our Appeal has been dismissed and the Approval of this project has been upheld.
Thank you once again to everyone who sacrificed so much of their time to this effort to save our community from wind industrialization, and thank you to Eric Gillespie and his team who did an excellent job for us.
Our legal team is reviewing this decision issued less than an hour ago, to determine what, if any, grounds there are for Appeal.
In the meantime the battle continues. Despite this setback, our efforts, along with financial reality, have helped to slow down the industrialization of Ontario’s countryside.
We are now awaiting the inevitable Approvals for the Snowy Ridge and Settlers’ Landing factories, and we are preparing for ERT appeals for each.
Again, thank you all and although this is not the desired outcome , hold your heads up. Character always wins out in the end.
Jan 23, 2015
Lawyers for the Province, wpd Canada and those appealing the Sumac Ridge wind turbine project submit final arguments in Pontypool on Friday (Jan. 23)
Kawartha Lakes This Week
By Mary Riley
PONTYPOOL – In the end, it will be temples or turbines, and lawyer Eric Gillespie has never seen a case like it.
Delivering his final oral arguments to the Environmental Review Tribunal hearing the appeal of a controversial wind energy project in Manvers Township,
Mr. Gillespie wondered aloud how a lawyer can win a case that has had “zero response” from the opposite side.
Mr. Gillespie represents the groups appealing the Province’s granting approval to wind energy company wpd Canada for its Sumac Ridge industrial wind turbine project, which would see five industrial turbines built in Manvers Township.
When the approval was granted in December of 2013, several groups, Manvers Wind Concerns, Cransley Home Farm and the Buddhist Cham Shan Temple, appealed the decision to the Environmental Review Tribunal. Much of 2014 was taken up for the hearing, which officially concluded last December.
The Buddhists plan to build four Temples mirroring those in China, and will abandon the $100 million project if the wind turbines are built. One temple has already been built on Ski Hill Road.
The appellants maintain the Province violated its own legislation in allowing two of the turbines to be built on the Oak Ridges Moraine, which is protected by law. They also allege the project will have a significant impact on human health, the environment and quality of life in the area.
Dozens of people appeared for the appellants, while the Province elected to call no witnesses and few appeared for wpd Canada.
Lawyers for the Province, wpd Canada and the appellants submitted their written arguments earlier this month, and the oral arguments were heard on Friday (Jan. 23).
Tribunal co- chair Heather Gibbs said the purpose of Friday’s hearing was to allow people to hear the highlights of the arguments.
Mr. Gillespie focused on several key areas including the natural environment (specifically the moraine), First Nations and the Cham Shan Temple, reiterating the impacts industrial wind turbines would have on each.
But he maintained that because there were so few witnesses from wpd Canada and none from the Province, the Tribunal would face “a very difficult” task. Without witnesses for the Province, Mr. Gillespie said it would be very difficult for them to respond to the appellants’ case.
In all his years of experience, he said, “I’ve never seen a case where there wasn’t a response.”
He told the panel the level of interest from the community, the number of people who followed the hearing and worked on the appeal demonstrates its uniqueness. But, he noted there were many unnecessary delays as the hearing took almost a year to complete.
Mr. Gillespie accused the Province and wpd Canada of failing to properly consult with First Nations (Curve Lake and Hiawatha) band leaders to address their claims wind turbines would interfere with their Treaty 20 lands and harvesting rights. He said the Province should have met with them “government to government” to address the concerns.
He alleged the same relating to the Cham Shan Temple, noting the federal, provincial and City of Kawartha Lakes leaders have welcomed the Buddhists. The temple, he said, will be one of only two in the world and will draw people for its pilgrimages.
He noted a study of the impact of wind turbine noise on meditation can’t be done because there are no meditation centres in which to conduct them. But, the Buddhists who testified at the hearing were qualified as experts in their religious practice and testified about the requirements for meditation.
Mr. Gillespie challenged scientists who appeared for wpd Canada on species at risk ; saying they had not visited the moraine and were not basing their testimony on relevant studies. And he noted that not seeing a species does not mean they are not in the area.
“That’s the problem, you don’t see them; that is why they are called species at risk,” he said, but added if habitat is destroyed “you can’t get it back.”
Mr. Gillespie also accused wpd Canada of not adhering to tribunal direction; delaying the proceedings to the point where they narrowly avoided a costs order.
“They didn’t keep the parties informed…didn’t follow the tribunal’s direction and came very close to (legally defined) unreasonable conduct…before the hearing even started.”
When he concluded, Mr. Gillespie said, “There are some places in the province where turbines shouldn’t be built” and said the appellants have presented clear evidence to support their case.
He received several minutes’ applause when he was finished, but as the Province began its arguments, catcalls and guffaws erupted when people didn’t like what they heard.
Ms Gibbs put a stop to that, demanding respect from the audience, and also banned cameras and videotapes after she was informed someone was using them. Audio recording was permitted, she said, but only for personal use, not publication.
The Province’s primary counsel, Andrew Weretelnyk, said the appellants have not proved their case because much of it was supported by opinion rather than fact. He said “no adverse influence” should be drawn by the decision not to call witnesses; that decision rests with counsel based on quality of evidence.
He denied the Province kept anything about the project hidden; that Sumac Ridge has always been five turbines. He also challenged some of the appellants’ witnesses, particularly those testifying about species at risk, saying bird expert Geoff Carpentier had no experience with wind turbines and birds.
Mr. Weretelnyk said the onus was on the appellants to show irreparable harm to the environment, and they “haven’t met the tests.”
He also challenged testimony about potential fuel spills from the turbines, saying keeping them in the base does not make them a storage facility for hazardous materials.
The Province also addressed First Nations concerns, saying Treaty legislation and environmental legislation did not fall within the tribunal’s mandate for the purpose of the hearing. The Province maintained that while First Nations concerns were sincere, there were no tests that supported their claims in law.
When it was wpd Canada’s turn, their lawyer John Richardson asked the tribunal to refer to his written submissions (hard copy of which they had not received on Friday). He summed up most of his rebuttals to Mr. Gillespie by saying the Province’s lawyers had covered most of the same points.
Mr. Richardson’s position was that the appellants’ evidence did not prove there would be harm to human health, water, plant and animal life. He also noted documentation relating to the Sumac Ridge approval has been posted on the company’s website for public review.
A decision in the case is expected sometime in February.
Final Day in Landmark Wind Hearing on Oak Ridges Moraine,
First Nations and Buddhists
Final arguments will be heard by the provincial Environmental Review Tribunal this Friday in a landmark Hearing that pits a wind developer against defenders of the Oak Ridges Moraine, hundreds of local residents, Buddhists building a twenty-year old Buddhist pilgrimage project, and First Nations. The developer is wpd (Canada) who calls the almost 500ft tall turbines near Pontypool, one hour north-east of Toronto, “Sumac Ridge.”
Please plan to attend or to cover this significant event.
Friday January 23, 2015, 11:00 a.m. at the Pontypool Community Centre, 254 John Street Pontypool, Ontario. Open to the Public.
The project, approved under McGuinty’s policies, is not green. It will sit on the protected Oak Ridges Moraine on sensitive high aquifer vulnerability land, meaning the area is highly vulnerable to contamination. The project seriously damages significant woodlands, wetlands, water features and species at risk areas of the protected Moraine.
Final Day in Landmark Wind Hearing on Oak Ridges Moraine, First Nations and Buddhists
Final arguments will be heard by the provincially appointed Environmental Review Tribunal this Friday, January 23rd, in a landmark Hearing at 11:00 a.m. at the Pontypool Community Centre, 254 John Street Pontypool, Ontario. Open to the Public.